In this interview, Myles Zhang discusses with Madeline Feierstein his research project on the history (and possible future) of the old Essex County Jail in Newark.
.
.
.
Link to full length recording of meeting (five hours)
Written 2025 by Myles Zhang
Signed 2012, result of OPRA request submitted to New York City Department of Sanitation
Hello Council,
My name is Myles Zhang, and I’m a lifelong Newark resident.
I’d like to speak today about the trash incinerator in Newark, specifically the Covanta incinerator. As you know, a very large percentage of Newark’s land area is owned by the Port Authority and Newark Airport. And they pay Newark a licensing fee. But they can choose to use that land how they want to. One of those land uses is for the Covanta incinerator.
The Covanta incinerator burns at least 985,000 tons of trash a year, and it burns about 2,700 tons of trash a day. They’ve had contracts with about twenty municipalities. One of those contracts happens to be New York City. New York City pays about a $700 million contract over 20 years for the Covanta facility. When you look at that contract, that contract requires that New York City provide the Covanta facility with 352 trucks per day of garbage. So we’re burning several thousand tons per day from 352 trucks per day.
Not only is New York City required to provide the Covanta facility with that number of trucks. But if they fail to provide 352 trucks per day, New York City has to pay a penalty to Covanta for not giving them enough trash to burn. And that penalty is equal to 85% of the cost of burning the trash. So if New York City provides a ton of trash and pays a $100. And then one day they didn’t provide that ton of trash, they’d pay $85 in fees. Basically, Covanta has a very lucrative contract, a contract that has a guaranteed revenue. Regardless of if the municipality provides them that trash or not, they still get paid. Furthermore, there is a perverse incentive to burn trash at that facility because if they don’t burn enough trash, there’s a high penalty here. The consequences for Newark are more than obvious, right.
The trash burned in Newark is produced specifically from the New York City census tracts representing the Upper East Side and Upper West Side. The median income in the Upper East Side and Upper West Side is over $150,000 a year. And that trash is being burned in Newark, where in the Ironbound the median income is under $50,000 a year. So in other words, the trash from the wealthiest community in the United States is being burned in one of the poorest communities in the United States.
So what does the City of Newark get for all of this? Well, for one thing, the port and the airport are the two most valuable pieces of real estate in Newark. About $500 billion a year in commerce passes through the port and the airport. And $700 million of trash is being processed in the Covanta facility. But the majority of Newark taxpayer revenue is not being paid by the port and the airport, even though the port, airport, and the Port Authority’s contract with Covanta are among the most valuable pieces of real estate in Newark.
For instance, if you look back, one contract that the City of Newark made in 2021 was the Host Municipality Fee for the Covanta facility, which was about $2-3 million a year. But if we break down the cost of the contract by the amount of trash burned, for every $100 that New York City pays Covanta to burn its trash, the Host Municipality Fee as a percentage of that cost of burning trash is about 70 cents. So 0.7% of the money that New York City pays to Covanta gets cycled back to the City of Newark. That is 0.7% of $700 million.
Newark is being ripped off. Newark is getting the short end of the stick. And this is a systemic pattern here. I think one thing that this council should distinguish is between winning the battles vs. winning the war, right. We can get a higher deal, a better deal from Covanta. We can get a better trash incinerator. We can get another Amazon warehouse, which you call winning the battle. But what does winning the war look like?
For me, winning that war means you don’t have that trash incinerator here. You don’t have that Amazon warehouse here. You don’t have those polluting industries here. You have better industries for a larger vision of the city. So I encourage this council to aggressively pursue action against the Port Authority, against Covanta, so that Newark gets paid its fair share of the $500 billion in retail volume that passes through Port Newark.
Thank you. And keep up the fight.
.
.
.
3D Model References and Methodology. See also: Tips for Navigating the Model.
.
2025
Two Envisioning Seneca Village presentations at the 50th annual meeting of the Social Science History Association in Chicago, 20-23 November 2025: A conference paper “ESV: A GIS Repository of Archival and Archaeological Records” and “ESV: Visual and Narrative Storytelling Using Archaeological Records.”
Project awarded the 2025 Roy Rosenzweig Prize for Creativity in Digital History by the American Historical Association and the Roy Rosenzweig Center for History and New Media at George Mason University.
ESV presented at the Urban History Association 11th Biennial Conference in Los Angeles, CA, 9-12 October 2025.
The ESV team celebrated the 200th Anniversary of Seneca Village at a Founders’ Day event hosted by Mother AME Zion Church and the Central Park Conservancy on Sunday, 14 September in Harlem. Marking the occasion, updated annotations and notes on the history of AME Zion Church and Cemetery as well as new renderings of the location and building were added to the Tour through the Visualization, and we created a new double-sided PDF about AME Zion at Seneca Village, “Envisioning AME Zion,” available here.
Project featured in the September 2025 issue of the African Diaspora Archaeology Newsletter.
Project featured in local news blog West Side Rag in August.
Project profiled on Planetizen, “Researchers Digitally Reconstruct Lost NYC Free Black Village,” in August.
ESV presented at Global Urban History Project 2 Berlin conference: Stretching the Limits of Global Urban History in Berlin, Germany, 10-11 July 2025.
“Seneca Village, Envisioned” published in Urban Omnibus in June. The essay walks through the methodological questions and considerations involved in the project’s visualizations.
Honored as Best Digital Project of 2024 by the Victorian Society New York in May.
Presented ESV at Mapping Spaces, Embodying Territories, a two-day conference on spatial humanities and GIScience at St. Louis University, 3-4 April 2025.
Winner of the Digital/Interactive Map Category, 2024, in the 52nd Annual CaGIS Map Design Competition (in March).
Featured at the Central Park Conservancy’s event to launch “Seneca Village: Toward a Permanent Commemoration” at the Schomburg Center in NYC on 13 March.
Imagery from Envisioning Seneca Village featured on CUNY TV in March. See the Urban U episode here.
The team presented Envisioning Seneca Village within the Dyckman Farmhouse Museum Spring 2025 lecture series on 26 Februrary.
2024
November: Featured on the Central Park Conservancy’s Seneca Village website.
November: Profiled in Barnard College news and alumnae magazine: “A Collaborative Reenvisioning of Seneca Village.”
“Visualizing Seneca Village: Building an Informed and Collaborative 3D Virtual Model of a Displaced 19th-Century Black Community” presented at the annual meeting of the Social Science History Association in Toronto, Canada, in October.
High-resolution still images provided on the project site (A Tour through Seneca Village) in October.
A printable PDF version of the tour through the Envisioning Seneca Village model, with site maps added to the project in October. See “Envisioning Seneca Village: A Map-based Tour.”
Project “soft launch” at envisioningsenecavillage.github.io in June.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
1959 Map of “Blighted” Areas by Newark Central Planning Board
.
.
.
.
2,500+ copies printed and distributed
.
.
.
In alphabetical order
.
.
.
.
From summer 2024
.
Chinese music: Feng Yang (The Flower Drum)
.
“The founders of a new colony, whatever Utopia of human virtue and happiness, allot a portion of the virgin soil as a cemetery, and another portion as the site of a prison.”
Nathaniel Hawthorne, The Scarlet Letter, 1850
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Interstate Highways in Newark |
Public Housing in Newark |
How an infrastructure project ruined a racially integrated neighborhood |
How public housing was designed to fail black families |
![]() |
![]() |
.
.
.
.